Remuneration committee |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The members of the remuneration committee were: Ntombi
Langa-Royds (chairperson), Joe Shibambo and Jerry Vilakazi. All the
members are non-executive directors. PwC, appointed by the
company, acted as remuneration advisors to the committee and
provided detailed information on market trends and the competitive
positioning of remuneration. The committee normally asks the CEO to attend its meetings but he has no voting rights. He does not participate in discussions on his own remuneration, which is set by the committee. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Terms of reference | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The committee performs all functions necessary to fulfil the role stated in its terms of reference, including: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Compliance with terms of reference | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The committee has reviewed group remuneration policies to ensure
these are aligned with the company’s strategy and linked to
individual performance. For a more detailed report on remuneration. View the remuneration policy of the company and shareholders will be requested to pass a non-binding advisory to indicate support for this policy at the annual general meeting. The fees proposed for non-executive directors for 2011, which are subject to shareholder approval. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Black economic empowerment and transformation committee* |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The members of the BEE and transformation committee were:
Ntombi Langa-Royds (chairperson), Joe Shibambo, André
Lamprecht and Peter Malungani. All members of the committee are
non-executive directors. The committee has its own terms of reference approved by the board and reviewed annually. The chairperson reports to the board on the activities and recommendations made by the committee and the latest minutes of committee meetings are included in board packs. The committee assists the board in adopting a holistic approach to transformation and complying with all relevant legislation or charters. The newly constituted social and ethics committee had its first meeting on 26 October 2010. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| * This committee has been reconstituted and in the new financial year will be known as the social and ethics committee | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Terms of reference | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| In line with its terms of reference, the committee’s objectives are to: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Compliance with terms of reference | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| For a detailed review on transformation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deal committee |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The members of the deal committee are: Peter Malungani
(chairperson), Peter Esterhuysen, Ntombi Langa-Royds,
André Lamprecht, Bheki Sibiya and Paul Stuiver. As noted,
Peter Malungani is not an independent director but the majority of
members are non-executive directors, most of whom are
independent. The committee is an ad hoc body and its terms of reference are to: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Committee meetings are scheduled when required by progress on transactions. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk management review |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| In 2008, PPC commissioned an independent high-level review of its
risk management function, which covered the group risk strategy,
governance, risk management process, risk management function,
culture and capability. Based on the results, PPC is further enhancing
its risk management system by adopting the ISO 31000 standard
for managing risks and King III principles on governance of risks. PPC’s commitment to managing risks and opportunities is supported by the recently developed comprehensive enterprise-wide risk management policy and framework. This follows a holistic approach to identifying, evaluating and treating risks and opportunities. With this tool, the organisation aims to ensure that managing risks and opportunities is an integral part of PPC’s corporate governance system. The group risk unit, being at the focal point of this process, is responsible for coordinating the identification and documentation of risk areas throughout the group, enhancing the risk management system and regularly monitoring its effectiveness. Internal audit plays a vital role in providing assurance to the board on the effectiveness of the system. In the case of any finding, these are taken into account as part of the continuous improvement of our risk management system. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Enterprise-wide risk management framework |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PPC’s risk management framework (shown below) has been aligned to the requirements of King III and incorporates best governance and risk practices. It is supported by a risk management plan that details the approach to be taken to address and improve risk management in PPC to achieve set objectives. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PPC’s enterprise-wide risk management framework |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developing the risk management framework |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interviews were conducted with a large number of stakeholders
including members of the board (executive and non-executive),
members of the risk and compliance committee, members of
management, internal and external audit. All the information
collected was considered and incorporated into the draft framework
where appropriate. The PPC group risk management policy has been developed against requirements of King III, among others, and was authorised in September 2010. The policy institutes the mandate from the group chief executive officer as delegated by the board and provides the statement of commitment for implementing risk management in the group. In terms of the policy, our goal is to ensure that risk management is embedded in our business by implementing an integrated risk management plan. A combined assurance model has been developed in line with King III to ensure that all risks identified are subjected to the appropriate level of control and assured by internal and external providers as appropriate. Internal audit provides assurance to the board on the effectiveness of the system. The risk management framework and processes have been developed to ensure a consistent approach to managing risk across PPC. A risk management plan details the approach to be taken to address and improve risk management in PPC to achieve set objectives. Managing risk and setting the risk appetite is the board’s responsibility, which it discharges through its risk and compliance committee. This committee has not yet articulated the group risk appetite since the focus has been mainly on audit materiality. With the implementation of the enterprise-wide risk management process in PPC, the board has taken the initiative in investigating ways of setting these values and the process of establishing the overall risk-bearing capacity and risk appetite is under way. This will ensure our business objectives and strategies are aligned with these values and that limits are set for management to take risks and exploit opportunities within set tolerance limits. The group values the importance of stakeholder engagement and has therefore attempted to identify its stakeholders and their reporting needs. To ensure transparency in our systems, risk information affecting these stakeholders will continue to be shared without compromising commercially privileged information. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Best-practice risk methodologies have been developed for the
group, modelled on existing best practice in risk management.
These are constantly reviewed and enhanced by a deployed risk
management team. Network groups are being established and their focus will be a meaningful contribution to the risk management strategic objectives. These forums will facilitate the proactive exchange of information between group risk, group compliance, group sustainability, group information technology and group finance functions. By forming these networks, PPC aims to eliminate ‘silo thinking’ across different risk types and ensure increasing integration of the traditionally separate domains of risks across the group. Our risk management process follows a consistent methodology and set of guidelines informed by the group policy and framework. The risk assessment process is linked to group strategy and objectives. As part of the implementation process, risk profiles have been developed for the group from top to bottom with the intention of directing information to all levels of the organisation. PPC is exposed to a wide variety of developments in the environment in which it operates and different potential risks and opportunities arise continually. Our aim is to take maximum advantage of viable opportunities and continuously evaluate other potential opportunities in all areas as an integral part of our strategy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk assessment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Strategic business risk assessments have been conducted for the PPC group, as well as for the lime, aggregates, Zimbabwe and Botswana divisions. In addition, business risk assessments were facilitated by group risk at all factories and all central office functions (such as group supply chain, information technology, organisational performance, transformation, etc). The various management teams have taken ownership of their specific risk registers, developed action plans to mitigate the risks and provided feedback to the risk and compliance committee. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Business continuity management |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| During the year, PPC aligned the management of business
continuity with the internationally recognised British Standard
25999 (BS 25999). This is also aligned with various other
International Standards Organisation (ISO) measurements currently
in use in PPC. Business continuity management is a process (of plan, do, check, act) to minimise PPC’s exposure to internal and external threats. Secondly, it synthesises all customer-related processes to provide effective prevention and recovery controls while maintaining competitive advantage and integrity of the group’s value system. The output of this process is a formal business continuity plan that will ensure the business is not unduly disrupted. The group is currently reviewing divisional business continuity plans to create a more robust business continuity management system. This process will be completed and fully implemented by the middle of the 2011 financial year. Aligning to corporate governance and ITIL (The Information Technology Infrastructure Library, a set of best practices for IT), IT disaster recovery is a key component of our business continuity management process, ensuring all critical IT services can be recovered in the event of a major business disruption within agreed time scales. The current Sandton (central IT facility in PPC) documented disaster recovery plan caters for both the Windows and SAP environments. Tests take place at the disaster recovery sites three times a year to ensure continuity of critical operations in the event of a disaster. To ensure business continuity across the group, disaster recovery network links, supplied by Telkom, are also in place. Each factory site schedules disaster recovery exercises for their local IT environment biannually at Sandton in a controlled and supervised environment. All disaster recovery plans are documented, tested and signed to ensure ongoing commitment of critical resources and continuity of operations. Detailed work instructions for all key stakeholders in the organisation are included. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Information security management |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The objective of information security is to protect information and
information systems from unauthorised access, use, disclosure,
disruption, modification or destruction. The terms information security, computer security and information assurance are frequently but incorrectly used interchangeably. These fields are often interrelated and share the common goals of protecting the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information; however, there are subtle differences between them. These differences lie primarily in the approach to the subject, the methodologies used, and the areas of concentration. Information security is concerned with the confidentiality, integrity and availability of data regardless of the form the data may take: electronic, print, or other forms. PPC is reviewing current information security controls following a recent independent audit that revealed some areas for improvement. The goal is to review current information security processes and their controls using ISO 27000:2005 as reference. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Insurance |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The following risk management surveys were undertaken by PPC’s insurance brokers and underwriters: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PPC’s insurance cover and associated premium were reviewed in May 2010. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
